Associative and Formal Concepts
نویسنده
چکیده
In several fields there is a divide between formal and associative models of concepts and reasoning. For example, in AI associative models such as neural networks and evolutionary computation are distinguished from symbolic, logic-based approaches. In psychology, fuzzy or category-based approaches compete with the “classical” theory of classification. In information science, systems based on dynamic, emergent structures can be distinguished from formal, manually designed structures. This paper argues that both modes of representation, formal and associative ones, need to be considered simultaneously for knowledge representation systems. This paper investigates the relationship between formal and associative structures and provides suggestions for bridging the gap between the two modes of representation.
منابع مشابه
A Classification of Associative and Formal Concepts
and others) have argued that there is evidence to support at least two co-existing systems of reasoning: an associative or sub-symbolic one and a formal, rule-based or symbolic one. This distinction occurs in many disciplines both in empirical models and in models that underly software implementations (Priss, 2001). In AI there is a divide between biologically inspired (i.e. associative) and lo...
متن کاملPreferred Lexical Access Route in Persian Learners of English: Associative, Semantic or Both
Background: Words in the Mental Lexicon (ML) construct semantic field through associative and/ or semantic connections, with a pervasive native speaker preference for the former. Non-native preferences, however, demand further inquiry. Previous studies have revealed inconsistent Lexical Access (LA) patterns due to the limitations in the methodology and response categorization. Objectives: To f...
متن کاملToward a Formal Model of the Shifting Relationship between Concepts and Contexts in Associative Thought
According to contextual focus, a dual processing theory, we shift between an analytic mode to apply conventional perspectives to a situation, and an associative mode to see things anew (Gabora, 2003). We present a model of this using the State-COntext-Property (SCOP) theory of concepts. A concept is modeled as existing in a state of potentiality until it interacts with a context, which causes i...
متن کاملToward a Formal Model of the Shifting Relationship between Concepts and Contexts during Associative Thought
The quantum inspired State Context Property (SCOP) theory of concepts is unique amongst theories of concepts in offering a means of incorporating that for each concept in each different context there are an unlimited number of exemplars, or states, of varying degrees of typicality. Working with data from a study in which participants were asked to rate the typicality of exemplars of a concept f...
متن کاملSigns and Formal Concepts
In this paper we propose a semiotic conceptual framework which is compatible with Peirce’s definition of signs and uses formal concept analysis for its conceptual structures. The goal of our research is to improve the use of formal languages such as ontology languages and programming languages. Even though there exist a myriad of theories, models and implementations of formal languages, in prac...
متن کامل